EngiQuest / Solar PV and electrical storage
Solar PV and Battery: Full Engineering Workbench
Take a solar PV and battery project from a written design basis through yield, electrical design, storage, dispatch, economics and a defended scenario choice, and export a limitation-aware report.
- Practitioner
- 13 stages
- 150 min
- Solar PV and electrical storage
Utility-scale PV is the same energy balance as a roof, at a different scale. Screening still starts with load, resource and limits.
The engineering outcome
A thirteen-stage workbench for a grid-tied, hybrid or off-grid PV + BESS study. You own the load schedule, resource, array, cables, battery, dispatch policy and tariff assumptions; the workbench recomputes every downstream result and records failed checks instead of hiding them.
- Who it is for
- Engineers and technical generalists who need a traceable first-pass design and a defensible comparison of PV and storage options before detailed design, procurement or a vendor quotation.
- Stages
- 13
- Estimated time
- 150 min
- Level
- Practitioner
What you will be able to do
- Write a design basis that later stages cannot quietly contradict.
- Build a load profile with a coincident peak and a critical-load subset for backup.
- Turn monthly irradiation into PV yield with explicit temperature, soiling, wiring, availability and clipping losses.
- Check string voltage, current, cable drop and breaker selection before specifying equipment.
- Size a battery for autonomy and daily cycling, then test it against a rule-based dispatch.
- Compare NPV, IRR, payback and LCOE across PV and BESS sizes without hiding infeasible options.
- Export a report that states assumptions, failed checks and unmodelled effects.
Journey map
- Define the site and the design basis Fix the site, configuration, backup requirement, design life and study boundary before any number is computed. Introduction / 10 min
- Build the load profile Convert a listed load schedule into daily and annual energy, a diversified peak and a critical-load subset for backup. Calculation / 12 min
- Build the solar resource and PV yield Transpose monthly horizontal irradiation onto the array plane and compute hourly-shaped PV yield with explicit loss terms. Calculation / 14 min
- Configure the array Turn a target DC size into a whole-module layout and check the DC/AC ratio against the inverter. Calculation / 10 min
- Check the electrical design Check the string voltage window, current, DC and AC voltage drop, breaker selection and bill of materials. Calculation / 16 min
- Size the battery storage Size nominal and usable battery energy for autonomy and daily cycling, and estimate service life and replacement. Calculation / 14 min
- Dispatch the system hour by hour Run a rule-based hourly dispatch and read self-consumption, self-sufficiency, curtailment and unserved energy. Calculation / 14 min
- Decide the system architecture Choose DC- or AC-coupled storage and a grid-tied, hybrid or off-grid boundary, and record why. Decision / 10 min
- Build the financial case Compute CAPEX, OPEX, NPV, IRR, payback and LCOE, and test the result against deterministic sensitivities. Calculation / 14 min
- Compare PV and storage options Re-run yield, dispatch and economics for several PV/BESS sizes and reject options that fail the stated boundary. Comparison / 12 min
- Plan implementation Turn the design into a pre-construction checklist that names the responsible evidence for each item. Implementation / 10 min
- Commission and verify Define the tests that prove the installed system matches the design, and the measurements that would falsify it. Commissioning / 10 min
- Assemble the reviewed report Write the engineering narrative, apply the rubric, download the report and state the professional review still required. Capstone / 14 min
Before you start
- Comfort with units: W, kW, kWh, A, V, %, and the difference between energy and power.
- A site and a load set you are willing to describe. No measured data is required, but every result inherits the quality of your inputs.
- Willingness to read the failed checks. A green summary does not mean the design is buildable.
Solar PV + BESS engineering report
A traceable record of the design basis, load, yield, electrical checks, storage, dispatch, economics and scenario choice, exported from one computed project state.
- Deliverable
- A downloaded Markdown report plus JSON snapshot, a written narrative and a signed review statement.
- Evidence model
- Rubric against produced artifacts, not completion ticks
Requirements
- State the site, configuration, backup target, design life and study boundary.
- Report the load schedule, diversified peak and critical energy behind the battery size.
- Report the resource assumptions, monthly yield, PR, capacity factor and clipping.
- List every failed electrical or battery check and what it means for the design.
- Report the dispatch balance, self-consumption, self-sufficiency, curtailment and unserved energy.
- Report CAPEX, NPV, IRR, payback, LCOE and the sensitivity that matters most.
- Compare at least three PV/BESS options and reject any that fail the stated boundary.
- Name every assumption that changes a result and every effect the model does not cover.
- End with an explicit statement that the report is a preview screen, not a stamped design.
Rubric
| Weight | Criterion | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| 10% | The design basis is explicit, internally consistent and used by every stage. | A site/configuration/backup statement that matches the computed dispatch and economics. |
| 15% | The load profile is traceable and the critical subset is defended. | Load schedule, diversified peak, critical energy and the autonomy decision. |
| 15% | Yield is reported with resource, loss and clipping assumptions. | Monthly table, PR, capacity factor, clipping and the resource source. |
| 15% | Electrical checks and failed constraints are reported, not hidden. | String voltage, current, cable drop, breaker and BOM results with failures visible. |
| 15% | Storage sizing and dispatch are consistent with the load and boundary. | Usable/reserve energy, power, service life, SOC trace and the energy-balance result. |
| 15% | The financial case states its boundary and does not overclaim. | CAPEX, NPV, IRR, payback, LCOE and sensitivity with assumptions. |
| 15% | The report distinguishes a preview screen from a professional design conclusion. | Limitations, open risks and a named professional review requirement. |
The workbench is deliberately deterministic. Measured weather files, shading, protection coordination, detailed structural design and probabilistic uncertainty belong to a later, reviewed phase.
Journey limits and sources
Limitations
- Preview only: the content has not completed independent engineering review.
- Deterministic screening: one representative day per month, no measured weather year or probabilistic uncertainty.
- Electrical screen only: no protection coordination, earthing design, structural design or utility interconnection study.
- Financial screen only: no financing, tax, grant, demand-charge or merchant-price modelling.
- No code compliance, constructability, warranty or bankability conclusion.
Review status
- Needs engineering review
- Professional review is required before publication or use as a design basis.