EngiMetric Arena / Spot the Error

Did the transformer review forget future growth?

  • Spot the Error
  • Electrical
  • intermediate
Competency Quantitative reasoning primary Design and sizing supporting

What you should take away: Apply demand and future-growth allowances in the right order and distinguish the demand figure from the transformer rating that must carry it.

The situation

What is happening

A plant review starts with 520 kVA of connected load, applies a 75 % demand factor and then adds a 10 % future-growth allowance. The reviewer writes down a 400 kVA transformer because 520 x 0.75 is 390 kVA. What standard rating does the complete calculation support?

Given

Scenario values with units
QuantityValueUnitNote
Connected load 520 kVA Sum of connected equipment ratings.
Demand factor 75 % Applied to the connected load.
Future growth 10 % Allowance applied after demand.
Reviewer note 400 kVA The rating written in the review.

Assumptions this challenge makes

  • The demand factor and growth allowance are project assumptions, not measured values.
  • The transformer is selected from the standard rating table in the calculator.
  • No spare capacity beyond the stated growth allowance is added.

Your call

Your answer

Enter the smallest standard rating that carries demand plus the stated growth allowance.

What this challenge does not establish

  • The demand factor and growth allowance are inputs; the calculation does not verify them against the actual load profile.
  • Transformer impedance, motor-starting voltage dip, harmonics and ambient derating are not modelled.
  • The standard rating table is a screening list, not a manufacturer quotation.
  • The result is a minimum rating, not a complete transformer specification.