Measuring flow over a weir, and knowing when the reading is wrong
Converting head over a crest to discharge for common weir shapes, and the conditions that invalidate the reading.
The engineering question
A weir is installed to measure flow. What does the head actually mean, and when will the calculation be wrong?
Worked example
The figures below were produced by running the Weir Flow Calculator with the same inputs — during the build, from its authoritative engine.
| Discharge | 0.1147 m³/s |
|---|---|
| Discharge | 114.731 L/s |
| Discharge per metre of crest | 0.0765 m²/s |
| Weir type | Rectangular suppressed |
| Assessment | Rectangular suppressed: Q = 0.115 m³/s (114.7 L/s) at 0.12 m head. Apply on a sharp-crested, fully ventilated crest — otherwise multiply by a carry-over/velocity-approach correction. |
- Discharge is the coefficient times crest length times head to the 1.5 power.
- Head is measured upstream of the nappe, not at the crest face.
- Submergence of the nappe reduces discharge and needs a correction.
Sanity check
Doubling the head increases discharge by about 2.8 times, not 2. That is the signature of a weir relationship.
Tools for this problem
These are the EngiMetric calculators that compute the numbers in this topic. Each one shows its formula, its units and its limits rather than returning a bare result.
References & standards
- ISO 1438-1 — flow measurement through open channels
- USBR Water Measurement Manual
Related problems
Why a pump is cavitating and what NPSH margin it needs
Working out the net positive suction head available at the pump eye, and why a few centimetres of margin matter.
Also: Environmental
How much stormwater storage a site actually needs
Comparing peak inflow against the permitted discharge and turning the difference into a storage volume.
Also: Civil & Structural